
Telework
and Vocational Training: Distance or e-Learning for Remote Workers
Nicole Turbé-Suetens
This report has been produced with the support of the
European Commission, DG Employment and Social Affairs, under the European
Social Fund (article 6). Views expressed within the report are those of the
author and do not reflect the views of the European Commission.
Euro-Telework
Nicole
Turbé-Suetens © November 2000
CONTENTS
0. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. VOCATIONAL TRAINING IN THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY
2. THE E-LEARNING PROCESS
3. E-LEARNING PLATFORMS
3.1 Products and suppliers
3.1.1 Ariadne
3.1.2 Campus Virtuel
3.1.3 CourseInfo
3.1.4 DOCENT
3.1.5 Ingenium
3.1.6 Lotus (LearningSpace)
3.1.7 LUVIT
3.1.8 Top Class
3.1.9 VirtualU
3.1.10 WebCT
3.2 Characteristics of a platform
3.3 Pricing
4. E-PEDAGOGY
5. E-COURSES
6. VOCATIONAL TRAINING FOR TELE-ACTIVITIES
6.1
Belgium
6.2
Denmark
6.3
Finland
6.4
France
6.5
Germany
6.6
Ireland
6.7
Italy
6.8
Portugal
6.9
Spain
6.10
United Kingdom
7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
8. BIBLIOGRAPHY
0. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Rapid growth in the use of the Internet over the last few years has had a considerable impact on economies. It is not simply a matter of the 'new economy', but of a transformation of all enterprise processes, new employer-employee relationships deriving from new ways of organising work, and the necessary link with knowledge which is becoming vital. Knowledge is now a recognised element of competitiveness, and that in turn means it must be easily accessible to everyone at all times. In the field of vocational training, this has brought about nothing short of a revolution, with most training packages still organised according to models that are quickly becoming archaic – in other words, with people obliged to go to a particular place on a particular time to undergo training delivered by 'a person who knows', and therefore in receiving mode rather than in one of ongoing or regular exchange. Apart from being tedious, this traditional formula tends to promote segregated access to knowledge, and in particular takes no account of something that has become a key factor in the business world: time and speed in the context of globalisation.
This summarised report on vocational training for tele-activities in Europe reports on some current training programmes, and also seeks to draw up a list of needs, and of the pedagogical tools that are in use and available. The research that went into producing this report has revealed a fact of the highest significance: that tele-training is an extremely volatile issue that is being constructed in a constantly changing environment. For example, products and producers are difficult to identify because the plethora of disappearances, mergers/absorptions, partnerships and new companies means one has to be permanently on the alert if one wants to sufficiently well informed to choose tools and adapt to those that derive most benefit from the use of new technology. It is worth noting that an exhaustive study of the comparative analysis of e-learning platforms conducted by French researchers in 1999-2000 largely identified different products from year to year because of these movements. Clearly, e-learning and distance learning involving intensive use of technology, including the Internet, constitute a new, fast-growing activity. The reason for that is simple. One the one hand, there has been a fairly collective, growing awareness of the importance of knowledge; on the other hand, more and more people need to be able to train up quickly as the need arises, and, if possible without having to travel too far, in order to become more efficient at their jobs.
If one considers the kind of training designed to enable teleworkers of the future, whether they are employed or entrepreneurs, to offer tele-service activities, clearly one's first thought is the fact that some training should – at least in part – be available on a distance-learning basis through the use of existing technological resources. Sadly, this is not the case. For one thing, there are very few training packages specifically on the subject, and those that do exist are often based on very traditional teaching methods. Things are moving quickly and products on the market are changing fast, but there are still parts of Europe where it is hard to train up for teleworking. However, it is also becoming easier to put together a telework training package based on e-learning simply by 'shopping around'. Training programmes of this sort frequently have a significant technological component: indeed, e-learning packages based on IT (e.g. materials, office technology, presentation, publication, communications and the Internet) are in plentiful supply on all markets. The phenomenon took shape in a single year. It is now quite easy, if you are prepared to go to some trouble, to train up for a very reasonable sum of money.
The report provides a summary of the various components of e-learning, namely platforms, teaching methods and curricula. It also contains a long, but not exhaustive, list of the main websites designed to help readers to find their way about, and choose some to add to their lists of 'favourites'. It stands to reason that such a list does not remain up-to-date for long. That is why there are plans to update the http://www.euro-telework.org website regularly until the end of the year, and then another site yet to be determined, and whose address will be communicated in due course.
The summary reveals that products have been developed in academic institutions both in the United States and in Europe. It is important to acknowledge the energy with which the academic community the world over is setting up virtual universities and virtual campuses. This return to university study has been accompanied by the development of new diplomas for which students can prepare via distance learning and in ways that involve quite different teaching methods and relationships. Disciplines of all kinds – from technical subjects at engineering school and in commerce to management and law – are affected. When the children now at school, college or high school (where they are growing increasingly familiar with computers, multimedia and communications media and cooperative working) get to university, they will find it perfectly natural to work on a virtual campus.
All of this – and it is where the report
concludes – forces us to think very seriously about the extraordinary
transformation that is taking place, and which will result in a radical change
in the relationships and organisation of work in the coming years. It follows
that today's enterprises and employees must carry out an urgent review of their
in-house training programmes and courses, and enable as many as possible to
learn how to use technological tools, and to access the training modules they
need to maintain and improve the level of their competences. Many large
enterprises have already acknowledged this and have set up, or are in the
process of setting up, in-house virtual campuses for their staff. The number of
company universities in the United States has risen from 400 to 1,600 in the
last ten years, and they are forecast to overtake academic universities by
2010. According to an IDC study, the amount of e-learning is expected to
increase no less spectacularly from €64m in 2000 to €244m in 2004.
1. VOCATIONAL TRAINING IN THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY
The Information Society is becoming increasingly known as the Knowledge Society in which knowledge is becoming a real asset for corporations and, of course, for individuals too. Knowledge is being capitalised amongst groups who share values and objectives; knowledge is becoming a sharable value; and knowledge is evolving continuously. It is turning the learning/training phenomenon into a central issue of society.
In the traditional 'industrial society', people were trained when needed to adapt to tools, or to prepare for hierarchical progression. In the 'information society', more and more workers are concentrated on data refining, transformation and distribution. This can be increasingly done from anywhere thanks to ICT, and there is rapid, constant change. This means that more and more workers (and the same is true of citizens) need to be able to adapt themselves very quickly when they need to, and at their own pace when they choose to. This means that education/training materials must become increasingly available at any time from any place.
One example that illustrates this new behaviour is the 'knowledge team' established by the Finnish Ministry of Labour in 1997: it produced an intermediary report, and has continued to study the issue with a new team since June 1999 (Finnish Ministry of Labour, 1997). The learning process and the access to knowledge is key: '… methods of lifelong learning and the organisation of learning can be applied at workplace level, not only to manage work but also to achieve continuous improvement and implement qualitative progressive steps.' Interestingly enough, this document also establishes the relationship between learning, education and creativity, and clearly sets out the roles of standard education and vocational knowledge. Altogether this shows how important it is to an individual to have access to the various levels of knowledge at any time during his/her life in order to be able to decide alone how to develop and how to adapt to the new constraints of society. No one starts life equal. It should be possible for anyone to catch up at any time, as it will increasingly become the result of an individual decision.
Distance learning has been around for many years, and it must be conceded that it has not necessarily been very successful even though providers have offered a better mix of media to make courses more attractive. Globally speaking, after the poor showing of the emerging computer-aided learning in the 1980s, many people thought that video and sound would make all the difference. However, courses based on CD-Roms have not created the huge market that was anticipated. In fact, in many cases, the CD-Rom simply replaced paper + audio, or paper + video, and this new pedagogical approach made little headway. Things are now changing with the Internet offering real interactivity at an affordable cost, and more and more people being computer-literate and having equipment at home and/or in the office. This phenomenon is very new and is expanding fast. Unfortunately, Europe is coming to it late, and the USA is taking advantage. Europe will have to react quickly to avoid being in the position of simply using translated American materials.
Some figures may give a sharper insight into this situation. A report published by Arthur Andersen France in April 2000 (Arthur Andersen, 2000) and a subsequent one published by the three French specialist bodies (Aska, Le Préau, Klr.fr, 2000), are some of the most recent documents on the subject.
The figures quoted in their research are impressive:
· web-training will account for 50% of the training market by 2005
· ICT training covers 60% of training in 2000, and should be less than 50% around 2003, according to the US-based research organisation, IDC
· Master's degrees will be increasingly delivered online
· the American e-learning market represented $92 million in 1996 (IDC) and $197 million in 1997 (US Bureau of Census); in 2002, 60% of training expenses in the USA will go on e-learning, and revenue is likely to top $10 billion in 2002 (IDC)
· New Media Think Tank expects all American corporations to use e-learning, principally those with complex products and remote workers
· corporate universities will become corporate e-campuses
· there is a direct link between the 'explosion' of the e-learning market and the number of computers and Internet connections in homes and offices: to compare with the situation in the USA and estimate the measures that Europe will have to take to close the gap, it is worth bearing in mind that 60% of US households will have a computer in the home by 2002, 92% of secondary school students have access to a computer, 55% of students have a personal computer, and 1 computer was available to 1.6 employees in early 1999. In this context, it is important to remember that 57% of Internet users at the end of 1998 were Americans. Of course, this is changing at a dramatic pace, but Europe will have to change really quickly to catch up, principally in the use field
We will conclude this section with Table 1, clearly showing how the use of training provision will start to change in 2001, and that by 2005 the trend will have finally reversed in favour of distance or e-learning solutions.
Table 1:
Growth in revenues from training provision, $ billion. (Source: Aska, Le Préau.
Klr.fr, 2000)
|
Year: |
'94 |
'95 |
'96 |
'97 |
'98 |
'99 |
'00 |
'01 |
'02 |
'03 |
'04 |
'05 |
|
Total |
50.6 |
52.2 |
55.7 |
58.6 |
60.7 |
63.1 |
65.7 |
68.3 |
71.0 |
73.9 |
76.8 |
79.1 |
|
E-learning |
0.02 |
0.05 |
0.1 |
0.23 |
0.5 |
1 |
2 |
3.6 |
6.3 |
11 |
19 |
34 |
|
Traditional |
50.6 |
52.2 |
55.6 |
58.4 |
60.2 |
62.1 |
63.7 |
64.7 |
64.7 |
62.8 |
57.5 |
45.3 |
2. THE E-LEARNING PROCESS
Most vocational training these days is still delivered in a very traditional classroom format despite the fact that Computer Aided Systems and authoring tools have been around for over 20 years. It has to be admitted that most courses were unappealing and usually quite expensive. They were unappealing mainly for two reasons: poor display quality on most computers until the graphical interface became standard on PCs, and the fact that few trainers understood that they had to fundamentally change their teaching methods model and their role. In fact, most courses were designed for the trainee to be alone, and in most of the cases (i.e. about 80% of the time) people dropped out.
Things changed radically with the spread of networks within organisations (intranets) and the increased use of the Internet, but the main change was that it was now possible to create attractive material and handle an interactive relationship between trainer and trainee. However, there have been few really good examples. Most large corporations are testing systems and conducting pilot projects because they realise that they need to completely change the way training is delivered to workers who are increasingly becoming e-workers. In this field, the process of change is slow, but this can be easily explained. Implementing e-learning in an organisation requires:
· the availability of good quality secured networks
· the acceptance of new tools by users
· a choice between an educational platform, providers and ASPs
· the definition and development (or acquisition) of contents
· the existence of trainers who become 'tutors', 'mentors' or 'coaches'
· the possibility of capitalising the knowledge of the organisation
· and, of course, the fact that everybody is familiar with the use of a PC, e-mail etc.
This cannot be done in a month or two, and it also requires a strategic decision within the organisation as well as investment and time – not forgetting a credible sponsor to foster the process of change. Experience shows that this takes at least a year from the point when it is decided to implement an e-learning facility in the organisation to the point when workers use it spontaneously. This is the best case, when communications and pilot testing have been successfully addressed within the organisation.
However, as e-learning becomes one of the organisation's competitive tools, as if they were new methods of work, it is sure to develop, and hopefully best practices will become available.
In April, Arthur Andersen published a study in France reporting that only 12% of the companies interviewed (74 companies in all) used the Internet for training purposes, and that 22% used their intranet. By comparison, the USA spends 60% of its training budget on e-learning alone! Still a long way to go. However, an IDC study published earlier this year gives a very optimistic forecast for the development of online training in Europe, predicting a 42% growth in the market each year: in figures, this means a turnover generated by online education of €64 million in 2000 to a turnover of €244 million in 2004.
Table 2: Prioritising needs for
'industrialising' distance learning. (Source: Aska, Le Préau, Klr.fr, 2000)
|
Need |
Reasons for industrialising |
|
Constraints/Dilemmas |
|
Organise the training facility |
Centralise and disseminate
information in the training catalogue for teams and potential users |
|
Reconcile jobs, the training offer and delivery of the
training Manage the various
responsibilities and roles of a range of actors (e.g. trainers, training
managers and managers) |
|
Organise pedagogical resources |
Capitalise resources and
uses, keep up-to-date |
|
Reconcile the approach based on standard pedagogical cost
killers and the number of authors, formats and new pedagogical approaches |
|
Manage enrolments |
Individualised and
customised training paths needed as and when |
|
Reconcile a personalised and decentralised approach,
taking into account the characteristics of the trainees and the efficiency
resulting from automatic and batch treatment |
|
Deliver |
Develop responsibility, decentralise and establish
relationships between the people and their resources |
|
Reconcile the use of a range of resources, the visibility
of training paths, their dynamics and economics, and the efficiency of
communication |
|
Administer |
Optimise technical resources |
|
Distribute all kinds of resources, rich media (e.g.
sound, images and video) and guarantee satisfactory access times |
With this information and with some certainty of growth, the main issue is how to identify the success criteria for implementing e-learning. Most corporations are willing to erect real distance-learning platforms in order to manage the whole training process.
The chart below attempts to identify and classify an organisation's needs and priorities. Available products vary considerably, and in order to carry out the 'industrialisation' of the distance learning process, it is important to prioritise needs clearly (see Table 2).
The challenge faced by corporations will most probably be the re-engineering of the whole training process: they have to make choices that involve links between the new tools and the organisation, technical choices and priorities, and putting in place the right resources and HR management as well as the pedagogy itself. All these choices will incorporate three actions or decisions that are far beyond the price issue of the product itself:
· implement customised, distributed training 'industrially'
· rationalise the training process from information to evaluation of the results
· invest upfront in order to reduce operational expenses
Globally speaking, the structure of the new process, which represents the basic functions of a platform, will most probably resemble the diagram shown in Figure 1.
Fig.1: The
structure of the training process. (Source: Aska, Le Préau, Klr.fr, 2000)
3. E-LEARNING PLATFORMS
The first platforms appeared in the 1990s (mostly in the second half), and were mainly aimed at helping course developers and trainers in the major pedagogical functions of distance learning. For the most part, this meant:
· production and integration of pedagogical resources
· presentation of training programmes
· dissemination and access to resources
· building individual customised training paths
· management and follow-up of training paths
· coaching
· financial and technical administration
In ten years, the various functions of a platform have become increasingly integrated, and now represent a real benefit (in terms of finance and effectiveness) in the management of training. The above scheme represents the main functions of the available platforms. The offer has changed dramatically over the years, particularly last year. The rapid evolution of Internet use has also generated the phenomena of portals.
Portals represent a totally different approach based on marketing and service. They aim to be 'one-stop shops' where the potential customer or user will find all the information about what is available on the market. They are also a way of capturing targeted audiences for providers. The concept can be compared to a shopping mall where the customer can decide how much to buy from available services. It is briefly summarised in Figure 2.
Fig. 2: The portal/mall model. (Source: Aska, Le Préau, Klr.fr, 2000)
This new way of selling training has existed in the USA for about two years, and is just starting up in Europe. Enterprises that chose this approach were mostly companies selling CBT. Moving to the portal technology enables them to present a global offering where customers will buy exactly what they need, and find out about what is available on the market.
Major players on this market include SmartForce, which had the highest receipts in 1999, FT Knowledge, Smart Planet from Ziff Davis and Studi.com. Most still have problems in making any profit, and in some cases still need to position themselves to be in the BtoB or BtoC world.
Most portals were created in 1999 even where the original company was already in existence. This is part of reinventing a business to fit in with a new market trend. For example, Asymetrix became Click2learn; SmartForce was created out of CBT Systems, itself set up in 1984; FT Knowledge comes from Financial Time Management; and Studi.com was originally Cyberion + Tag Interactive. So far, most have been trying to position their offer on the BtoB market; only SmartPlanet deliberately chose BtoC.
Let us now concentrate on the platforms, as they represent a strategic decision for corporations; they also represent the most advanced technology, and facilitate total management of distance training in a given organisation, or for a given training company. The aforementioned French study published by Aska, Le Préau (Paris Chamber of Commerce), and Klr.fr at the end of 1999 (updated in August 2000) is one of the few available documents that attempt to compare existing platforms. It was based on data made available by the suppliers, and on the knowledge of the authors of practical examples using those platforms. Most of the products are recent, and are still regularly updated and adapted to the evolving technologies, mainly the Internet. It is interesting to note that of the nine platforms presented in 1999, most were no longer in existence in 2000, and that major 'moves' have occurred over the last few months:
· ORACLE abandoned OLA
· IBM abandoned DLS
· Macromedia sold Pathware to Lotus
· Citcom is no longer selling WebTutor
· Sybase is no longer selling NGL
· Asymetrix replaced Librarian with Ingenium
· Lotus integrated Pathware into LearningSpace
Products like CourseInfo, WebCT, TopClass, and VirtualU have evolved on a regular basis, and two new French platforms have become available and are included in the comparison chart presented in this report: they are Sylfide and Plei@d.
A brief presentation of these platforms and their major characteristics is probably helpful before putting them into a comparative chart. The chart might become a practical tool for readers who wish to keep the information up-to-date in the near future.
3.1 Products
and suppliers
This brief overview of the available offer is based on the August 2000 version of the report produced by Aska, Le Préau, and Klr.fr. The intention is not to present a fully exhaustive comparison, but only to present some of the most popular platforms and, where possible, indicate if European language versions are on the market.
3.1.1 ARIADNE: http://ariadne.unil.ch
The name stands for Alliance of Remote Instructional Authoring and Distribution Networks for Europe; it has 15 servers throughout Europe with pedagogical material made available to the members of the Association. Pricing varies according to use. A consortium is being set up to sell and distribute the platform.
3.1.2 Campus Virtuel: http://www.archimed.fr
This French product has been on the market since July 2000; it was jointly developed by the Archimed company (specialists in workflow technology) and the University of Lille. It enables genuine cooperative work among students, and includes a virtual desk.
3.1.3 CourseInfo: http://www.blackboard.com
This platform was created in 1997 by the Blackboard company, a Washington-based software publisher. They have had a European subsidiary based in Amsterdam since March 2000. Version 5 has been available since June 2000.
3.1.4 DOCENT: http://www.docent.com
The DOCENT platform is published by Mountain View (Stanford, USA), a company that initially specialised in evaluation tools. A European subsidiary was set up in March 2000, and a Paris office was opened in September 2000. DOCENT covers the whole training process from the learner's competences assessment to full integration of the content and measurement of the impact of the training on company performance. A mobile version is available for learners on the move.
3.1.5 Ingenium: http://www.x-perteam.com
The American publisher Asymetrix dropped Librarian in favour of Ingenium with large corporations as target market. The Ingenium platform organises training from the point of view of competences, resources and administration.
3.1.6. Lotus (LearningSpace): http://www.lotus.com/learningspace
Lotus is an IBM subsidiary owner of Lotus Notes and Domino. IBM got rid of its own platform DLS a few months ago and Lotus acquired Pathware from Macromedia, which is becoming the core of LearningSpace. LearningSpace should be available in 15 languages by the end of 2000. One of the product's main developments is that it is now based on a relational database (SGBD SQL server, Oracle or IBM DB2) and no longer requires the use of Domino or Lotus software.
3.1.7 LUVIT: http://www.luvit.com
Initially developed by the University of Lund (Sweden), this platform is now a commercial product sold by the LUVIT company. It is used by one of the major Swedish unions (SIF), and is already available in the major European languages (English, French, German and Spanish in addition to the Scandinavian languages).
3.1.8 TopClass: http://www.wbtsystems.com
This platform has been marketed since 1995 by WBTSystems with major partners like Sun and Oracle. It is compatible with many contents available on the market, and there is no intention to set up subsidiaries in other countries. It has a distribution policy through partners like HyperOffice in France.
3.1.9 VirtualU: http://www.vlei.com/vu_overview.html
Another Canadian platform available in English, Spanish, Portuguese and French, and distributed by Virtual Learning Environments based in Vancouver (Canada). No subsidiaries in Europe, but a presence in Mexico and China. A robust and easy-to-use platform; also employed in the academic world and in corporations.
3.1.10 WebCT: http://www.webct.com
Developed by the University of British Columbia (Canada), WebCT has been marketed since 1999 by ULT (Universal Learning Technology). It is one of the most widely used platforms in the academic world (120,000 courses to 5m learners in 51 countries). It is being translated.
The offering changes every day and the subject is becoming fashionable. A few other names one might encounter while shopping are Saba (the second biggest Californian supplier), Syfadis, Sylfide and Plei@d (new French offerings).
More and more products are, of course, web-enabled, and in some cases it is even possible to test the product online for a few weeks before deciding whether to buy.
Before presenting the summary chart of the different platforms, let us first summarise the main characteristics of an e-learning platform, given that the platform is the complete toolbox for managing, creating and distributing distance learning training. It is therefore necessary to break the characteristics down into management, administrative and pedagogical capacities.
3.2. Characteristics of a
platform
Management characteristics:
· needs analysis
· registration
· forecast and budget
· validation of prerequisites
· knowledge validation
· updating of the offering
· online availability of training modules
Administrative characteristics:
· catalogue
· data streaming (e.g. registrations, billing and payments)
· dynamic statistic
Pedagogical characteristics:
· multimedia architecture (sound, images, 3D and video)
· interactivity
· variety of pedagogical approaches (e.g. individual, small groups and teams)
· tutoring or mentoring management
· access to external data bases and links to external resources
· optimal compatibility with available software
· creation and production tools
· follow-up of learner's path
3.3 Pricing
The objective here is not to provide a detailed comparison platform by platform, as this would be very complicated due to the fact that pricing strategies are in some cases fundamentally different. A few examples will give an indication, although each case is likely to be different because of the specific environment and number of learners.
Generally speaking, e-learning is cheaper than traditional training, and that is one of the reasons why so many large corporations are seriously thinking of using it, bearing in mind that it additionally offers the flexibility and tracking tools needed to manage the training.
VirtualU and WebCT are very similar in price: approximately €3,100 per year for a campus, and double that for corporations. CourseInfo is slightly cheaper for corporations and free for academics. Ingenium is about 10 times that price for 10 workstations, and Luvit starts at €4,820.
Table 3: Comparison of distance
learning platforms. (Source: Aska, Le Préau, Klr.fr, 2000)
|
Product |
Publisher |
Launch |
Version |
Current |
References |
|
ARIADNE |
Association |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Campus Virtuel |
Archimed |
Jul 00 |
1 |
N/A |
CUEEP, INSA, University of Lille, EDF |
|
CourseInfo |
BlackBoard |
1997 |
4/5 |
Jun 00 |
Bell, Intel,
Dell |
|
DOCENT |
DOCENT |
1997 |
4.5.1 |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Ingenium |
Clic2learn, Asymetrix |
Mar 00 |
4 |
N/A |
Groupe Accord |
|
LearningSpace |
BM Lotus |
Jun 96 |
4 |
N/A |
ASF, FT, Lycée
du Vercors, Hermann Miller |
|
LUVIT |
LUVIT AB |
1997 |
3.0 |
Sep 00 |
Skandia,
K-world, Lernia |
|
CNAM PdL |
Sep 98 |
4 |
N/A |
Social Security, IFPME (Belgium) |
|
|
SABA |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Ford, Cisco,
HP, Procter & Gamble, Wells Fargo |
|
Syfadis |
ANTALIS |
Nov 99 |
1.1 |
Oct 00 |
Vivendi,
Groupama |
|
Sylfide |
Initiative développe-ment |
1997 |
2.2 |
Sep 00 |
Crédit Mutuel,
CCI |
|
TopClass |
WBT |
1995 |
N/A |
N/A |
Oracle |
|
VirtualU |
VLE |
1997 |
2.5 |
3 |
30
universities, 6 major corporations (Banque de Montréal…) |
|
WebCT |
Universal Learning
Technology |
1997 |
2.1 |
3 |
5 million users
in academia |
4. E-PEDAGOGY
This is the key
issue! Forecasts are generally optimistic, and products exist and are
increasingly robust and powerful, and meet even sophisticated needs while
remaining affordable. However, most trainers have still not realised that they
have to change and adopt totally new pedagogical approaches. Unfortunately, the
introduction of e-learning in a group or a corporation is often done by
newcomers who understood how to mix the different media and how to remain
available for coaching trainees.
Those who are still
in the classroom format with the trainer 'who knows' will quickly disappear:
training in the near future will be managed according to a completely new
process whereby the trainer is the customer and also has some knowledge. The
top-down approach, which is still a common method, has to be replaced by a
communicative, collaborative approach in which the trainer interactively
organises the trainee's progress.
In addition to this
new relationship between trainer and trainee, working conditions are evolving
very fast and more and more people work from 'anywhere' and train 'when they
need to'. This means that courses and trainers need to be available and that
new concerns have to be considered. Depending on the learner's situation and
the tools used, the situation will vary and an attempt must be made to optimise
the best technology adapted to each individual situation.
Figure 3 is an
attempt to synthesise what is possible in each case, and priorities in using
the best adapted technology. Moving from top to bottom, technology becomes more
'traditional', and moving from left to right the learner becomes more isolated.
The figure indicates that the major differentiation factor in the pedagogy
remains the new interactivity between actors.
When choosing a
course or a training solution, it is important to bear the following factors in
mind and find out how they interact on this graph:
·
subject to be
taught
·
speed at which the
new knowledge must be acquired
·
is it a conceptual
or a technical training subject?
·
how does the
trainer work and learn?
·
what are the
physical conditions in which the training will take place?
·
how much time can
be spent on the training?
·
is it individual
training or group training?
·
is it 'on the job'
training?
Those are 'on the
spot' questions that one should always have in mind when choosing the best mix
of media to suit the trainee's particular situation, while taking into account
his/her working conditions. It is only by answering such questions that the
best adapted media and tools can be chosen for an effective combination and
efficient training.
Fig. 3: Learning technologies: Technological complexity, asynchronous, synchronous? (Source: L'Atelier , 2000)
|
|
Learning technologies |
|
||
|
Learning group (synchronous) |
Satellite transmission |
CD-Rom multimedia interactive applications |
Computer-aided learning |
Lonely learner (asynchronous) |
|
Video/web conference |
Internet/ intranet |
Electronic performance support system |
||
|
Traditional courses |
Books |
Coaching |
||
|
|
Basic technology |
|
||
The people in charge
of training should also involve trainers in choosing the media to make sure
they are agreed and used.
You can select the
best course and with the best combination of media, but if it is not accepted
by trainees it will gather dust in a drawer; that means that time and money are
wasted and the trainers' credibility is lost because they were not able to offer
appropriate and adapted materials to fit people's needs. 'Shopping' for courses
on the Internet is becoming quite easy, and workers will become hard to please
if they are not involved in the process.
That said, it makes
sense to be more precise about what distinguishes e-pedagogy from traditional
pedagogy. The major differences are that:
·
trainers and
trainees are not necessarily in the same room any more
·
trainers and
trainees do not necessarily work at the same time or at the time decided by the
trainer
·
asynchronous
interactivity is a fact
·
synchronous
communication has to be agreed upon
·
the coach must
really deliver added value
·
the training path
must be clearly designed and agreed
·
the measurement of
results has to be defined.
There are more issues
to be considered, but those above on their own will impact heavily on
e-pedagogy compared with the traditional classroom.
5. E-COURSES
Provision is
flourishing, and as the PC becomes a utility in more and more households, it
will be natural for anybody looking to improve his/her knowledge to go shopping
on the Internet.
We should also keep
in mind that an increasing number of children will be familiar with the idea
that 'a computer is a learning tool', and that the number of students obtaining
Master's degrees using a virtual university will also grow quite quickly. In
addition, virtual universities will probably appear more accessible to adults
who are keen to get a degree, but not to attend courses on university premises.
We are at the beginning of a huge change in accessibility to knowledge, where
the individual will be able to chose and manage his/her knowledge and feel
responsible for it. If, for one reason or another, the employer does not want
to give the workforce access to some training, they will be able to obtain it
for themselves - and (why not?) even chose another employer. It is probably not
yet very clear how far this can affect social relationships, and how
independent citizens can become just because they can be trained whenever they
want to at an affordable price.
Today, about 60% of
available courses are clearly related to computers and software as well as to
languages. The direct impact of the large number of universities that are going
virtual will be the availability of a large number of courses in other
subjects. They will most probably form the basic materials for the development
of vocational training modules, and the open question here is: Will they be
delivered by the academic world or by training companies? It may be that fewer
training companies will probably exist in a few years' time, and that there
will be more extensive cooperation between the academic and the corporate
world. But, that is no more than a guess.
Why mention the
corporate world here? Only because the virtual campus of a corporation will
become a real asset for corporations, and that in the USA the number of
corporate universities has increased over the last 10 years from 400 to 1600.
It is forecast that by 2010, there will be more corporate universities in the
USA than academic universities. And of course, most corporate universities are
transforming into virtual campuses.
Another interesting
statistic to come out of the USA is the number of corporate portals being
developed in the coming years. A Delphi survey (http://www.delphi.com)
reports that 50% of the 300 corporations in Fortune 500 are in the process of
developing a portal, and another 25% intend to do so in the next two years. The
direct impact will be that these corporations will be able to deliver their
corporate courses to people who will have access to their portals (e.g.
customers, suppliers and partners), and that means that they will also compete
in the field of knowledge.
By way of
illustration, let us look at a recent announcement from Hewlett Packard. HP
knows how much training costs, and has developed an internal e-learning
solution. This solution, which has been open to anybody since May 2000, offers
customised training courses over the Internet. The offering is called
'e-learning on tap', and mainly concentrates on technical subjects like Unix,
Linux and Windows. It costs about €1,000 a month for unlimited use. To find
more, visit: http://www.hp.com/e-learning
To find more about
available courses, it is probably worth spending some time surfing some of the
websites referenced at the end of this report, bearing in mind that things
change very quickly, and that new offerings appear every day. Some specialist
newsletters are also emerging; they are really helpful for people responsible
for watching the market and making choices when developing a corporate offering
or launching a pilot experience. A practical example in France is the free
newsletter from Edubyweb at http://www.edubyweb.com
6. VOCATIONAL TRAINING FOR TELE-ACTIVITIES
As this report makes
clear at the beginning, telework is seen as a way or organising work in a
company, and not as a specific employment status. A teleworker is a worker with
a working contract from an employer and working in an organisation where
telework is an accepted organisational mode. This clearly means that
teleworkers act in an agreed environment, and that training is made available
to help them cope with all situations in which they need to improve their:
·
technical skills
·
behavioural skills
·
professional
skills
Indeed, teleworkers
need more skills than the traditional worker in the workplace. This is due to
the fact that they work remotely from the organisation, their colleagues and
their managers. They need to have good technical skills in order to be as
autonomous as possible with the system they use to perform their job, and they
need different behavioural skills as their working environment is not the same
as an office.
We definitely would
like to avoid tackling the case of the teleworker who works constantly from
home as this is not the way social partners recommend telework to be
implemented. In order to continue to be part of the working team, the
teleworker will work from time to time in an alternate office or place. The
frequency will be defined by agreement with the manager: it can be several days
a week, and the alternate location will also be agreed with the employer. The
most common alternative workplaces are the home, telecentres and telecottages
(we are tempted to consider the
two words as being synonymous), or
simply another building belonging to the company they work for that is closer
to the teleworker's home.
Clearly teleworkers
will want to have access where they are to the training modules that they need,
and they will want to avoid commuting just to attend a class because some of
their training needs will be specific and will require quick, if not immediate,
answer.
This report will not
look at vocational training needed to improve vocational skills, as this is the
same for all the workers of the organisation, and deciding to make it remotely
available using ICT is a strategic decision for the corporation that is related
to its competitiveness.
It is different for
technical and behavioural skills: these can be specific to individual
teleworkers, and enable them to perform their job remotely in good conditions.
The technical skills needed to be perfectly comfortable include:
·
all office-related
software
·
a systems
environment
·
remote access
specifics
·
communication
software
·
intensive use of
the intranet
·
the Internet
·
software specific
to the job
·
e-mail
·
other
For behavioural
aspects, it is desirable for teleworkers to have access to training modules to
enable them, if necessary, to improve the following skills:
·
time management
·
personal
organisation
·
communication
skills
·
negotiation skills
·
empathy
The situation is
slightly different for the remote worker who is an entrepreneur and sells
his/her services remotely. Practical experience shows that such people are
generally computer-literate but have severe shortcomings in entrepreneurship,
business-plan approach, communications, marketing and sales, and
administration. Business plans will of course define what the entrepreneurs who
sell their services remotely will do themselves, and what they will be
subcontracting or outsourcing. However, entrepreneurs have to do almost
everything themselves at the beginning because of lack of resources. This
classical issue of SOHOs (Small
Office/Home Office) and very small companies can largely be solved, or at least
helped, by quality training modules made available remotely.
A glance at what is
available in Europe (EU members plus Norway) shows that we still have a long
way to go, and that very little is available under 'telework offering'. It also
confirms that a real effort has to be made to compete with American products in
the field of distance training and e-learning. This is probably a good right
time to start as most European countries are getting better equipped, and new
ways of working are developing. The Internet phenomenon has also fostered
entrepreneurship in many countries, and more and more people want to acquire
new knowledge and access training through a PC at home or in the office.
The information that
follows is an initial attempt to find out what is available in European
countries, but it is not comprehensive. More input will hopefully be provided
by people reading this report, and thanks to the feedback loop, the content
will be enhanced for the report's online version.
6.1 Belgium
The Walloon Office
for Professional Training and Employment FOREM has launched a new training
experience called 'collaborative distance work' for both trainees and trainers
(http://www.forem.be) in the framework of European projects. Another
example has been developed by ICHEC (http://www.ichec.be) under
an ADAPT project. The Belgium network for open and distance learning
established in 1999 will most probably generate more examples in the coming
years, and the results will hopefully be available at http://www.be-odl.org
6.2 Denmark
The
'home-PC-concept', which was introduced in 1998 with an obligation to take the
EU-driver licence to learn how to use a PC, boosted the learning process in the
use of technology and telework. The ODIAL project (a retraining scheme for the
unemployed to become teleworkers) has developed some distance learning. The
most important element, though, is the Danish e-Learning LAB which aims to make
Danish people and society aware of new technologies for education purposes.
6.3 Finland
The first e-learning
experiments on telework probably started in Finland a few years ago, and an
additional step was taken by one of the major unions (SAK) with the 'you in the
movement – trade union school of the new time' project: this is a new way of
training trade union staff in subjects like 'values and cooperation' and more
technical subjects related to trade union organisation.
The 'Member-PC' programme
with more than 13,000 PCs installed has also been a boost to the interactive
relationship between the union and its members. This is a first step, and
information and/or educational material can now be made available.
6.4 France
Even if telework has
been very slow to take off in France, there is some experience of specific
training. The government training agency AFPA has developed six pilot training
experiments throughout the country, and two of them are being updated with new groups
of trainers. They are mainly aimed at people who want to set up their own
tele-service companies. A full report on those experiments is available in
French on the website of the French Telework Association http://www.aftt.net
The INTERFOR SIA in
Amiens (http://interfor.dyadel.net) has also trained more
than 100 people on tele-activities with a view to helping them start their own
business. ADAPT has also developed specific modules, including some distance
courses to train disabled people to become teleworkers. Large corporations
heavily involved in teleworking programmes like France Telecom and EDF/GDF have
developed internal training for their employees and managers.
6.5 Germany
The WABE project
awards a qualification called 'information assistant' to women who have stopped
work to bring up children; it uses e-learning facilities and teleworking
techniques. The project is supported by IBM. Another interesting initiative is
the qualification training to become a distance tutor organised by the
employers' association in Bremen; the association set up the Tele-Akademie
Bremen, which can be visited at http://www.wisoak.de/mmlshop/index.htm
6.6 Ireland
Aer Rianta, the Irish
Airport Authority, has provided a day-long orientation session for staff
interested in volunteering for a telework pilot programme. Details can be found
at http://www.cork-teleworking.com
The KITE Telecottage
in Enniskillen has build a successful model for rural ICT training aimed at
women returners. This programme has attracted over 1500 women into training
during the last five years, with the result that over 40% go directly into work,
some of them into teleworking. More examples are available in Ireland: they may
be found in The Teleworking Handbook, references for which may be found at the
end of this report.
6.7 Italy
An interesting
experiment took place following implementation of the new law enabling public
servants to be teleworkers. The CIPA project, which provides a complete
educational path to become a teleworker, will be available on the CIPA website,
thereby supplying the programme to a large number of people. This is intended
to link up with the (Public Sector Minister) 'Bassanini plan' which aims to
give 30 hours' training to 400,000 public servants in the next few months and
match the country's ambitious e-government plan.
European projects
(e.g. APOGEO 2000) and national public initiatives (e.g. NETTUNO and ITALICA: http://www.agora.stm.it and http://www.italica.rai.it)
are having a positive impact on the introduction of new pedagogical methods in
Italy. The medical community, which is already familiar with distance learning
and the working environment, and the public sector are moving quickly towards
new methods of work. ATENA is the most widely used Italian multi-language
platform, and is recognised by the Italian Labour Ministry as a tool for
reporting distance learning projects under the European Social Fund. It has
been fully developed by DIDA-EL and also delivers the European Computer Driving
Licence (http://www.didael.it).
6.8 Portugal
A telework training
course has been developed by the Associação Nacional das Empresarias in a
traditional classroom format for entrepreneurs. This is part of the Vida Nova
European project.
6.9 Spain
The Asociación
CEDERNA GARALUR Elkartea has developed a CD-Rom in English and Spanish for
training teleworkers in 'personal development' and 'communication skills'. This
project has been completed under the ADAPT project called the Joint Dona
Project. Another interesting experience in Spain, and not specifically
dedicated to telework, is one developed by FOREM Miguel Escalera and the CC.OO
(Workers' Commissions) union with assistance from two funded European projects
(TRAINS and ETUE-net). The content of the modules is related to an introduction
to the information society, union education and professional orientation.
6.10 United Kingdom
Probably one of the
best examples is the Scottish Professional Development Award in Teleworking,
which aims to provide people who have already a marketable skill with a basic
level of competency in IT skills. It helps them rethink their businesses and
take advantage of teleworking opportunities. London City University has
developed an 18-module training package called 'Managing change in the
workplace – teleworking' with funding from the European Social Fund. Each
module takes 4-10 hours to complete: some modules are specifically for the
teleworker, others are for the manager, and some are for both. There are also
two teleworking NVQs: one is 'Using IT for teleworking'; the other is 'Managing
IT for teleworking'. More details can be found in The Teleworking Handbook from
TCA in association with HP. And of course, we must not forget the
corporate-level pioneer British Telecom, which has a complete training offering
for employees, managers and customers.
7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Europe obviously has
a long way to go before homogeneously remote training in tele-activities is
available for teleworkers and entrepreneurs. However, this brief, initial
inventory is encouraging, and shows that a number of countries have started to
experiment in new ways of training. Interestingly enough, it appears that this
has often happened thanks to European projects: this has the advantage of
involving more than one country, and will speed up the dissemination process.
However, more will have to be done – and quickly – to develop a keen
competitive edge.
We have seen that the
academic world is moving fast into new ways of developing and distributing
courses, and substantial investment is planned in most countries for the
development of virtual universities. Large corporations are moving even faster
because they need to be able to develop knowledge at any time and keep track of
it. The corporate virtual campus is also becoming one of the elements that will
attract new talent, or help keep them in-house. In the knowledge society,
competition is based on new tools, and just-in-time training will be one of
them.
Training that is
available anywhere will also help to avoid the digital divide between
generations, as the younger generation will have been educated with the use of
computers and have increasing access to remote training. People who are now in
their 30s and 40s, and still following the traditional model, will have to
evolve and adapt to survive. This brings the management issue to the fore, as
management techniques are also changing very quickly, and managers need to have
the ability to train in order to change. The knowledge society is a society of
speed with a request for quality of life. This reinforces the need to be able
to be trained and to learn in chosen conditions and time. E-learning is one
answer to that request.
8. BIBLIOGRAPHY
Arthur Andersen, L'irrésistible
ascension du e-learning ou comment former dans la Nouvelle Économie, Paris,
April 2000
Aska, Le Préau,
Klr.fr, Choisir une solution de téléformation: l'offre de plates-formes et
portails de téléformation, Étude 2000 (see: http://www.aska.fr, http://www.preau.asso.fr, http://www.village-formation.com)
Dieuzeide, Henri
& Nathan, Pédagogie Les Nouvelles Technologies: outil d'enseignement,
Paris, 1994
EC, Communication
from the Commission: e-learning – designing tomorrow's education,
Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, May 2000
Finnish Ministry of
Labour, From Information Society to Knowledge-based Society: Employment by
innovation, Helsinki, 1997 (see: http://www.mol.fi)
La formation
online, Le Journal de l'Atelier
No 66, January 2000 (see: http://www.atelier.fr)
Jakupec, Viktor and
Garrick, John, Flexible learning, human resource and organisational
development: putting theory to work, London, Routledge, 2000
Martinengo, G, Telematica
e formazione professionale. Nuovi strumenti per nuovi metodi, Beltel
Newsletter, June 1999 (see: http://www.beltel.it)
Savoirs et
Compétences en éducation, formation et organisation, Actes de forum sous la direction de Jean-Claude
Ruano-Borbalan, Les Éditions DEMOS, 2000
TCA, The Teleworking Handbook (3rd
edition in association with HP), Telecottage Association, 2000 (see: http://www.tca.org.uk)
Trentin, G, Insegnare e apprendere in rete,
Zanichelli, Bologna 1998
Websites:
http://www.pconlineuniversity.com
http://www.pconlineuniversity.com
http://stanford-online.stanford.edu
http://www.kumc.edu/instruction/Vir_Clas/vir_clsrm.html
http://www.wcb.vcu.edu/wcb/intro/wcbintro.html
http://weber.u.washington.edu/~lspace
http://homebrew1.cs.ubc.ca/webct
http://emma.comm.arizona.edu/polis/demo/POLIS.cgi
http://www.intuitionpublishing.com
http://www.cork-teleworking.com
http://www.uta.fi/telework/english/